Re: [PATCH] bridge: make brctl showstp display port id
From: Joakim Tjernlund <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-01 17:47:37
Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote on 2012/05/01 19:39:55:
quoted
Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote on 2012/04/30 18:07:47:quoted
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:39:08 +0200 Joakim Tjernlund [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
My brctl showstp br0 always shows a 0 port id: eth2 (1) port id 0 state disabled designated root 8000.00069c00b2fb path cost 100 because port id is printed as a hex number in sys fs. Change the two hex occurrences(port no and port id) to decimal, just like all the other numbers in this area. Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <redacted> --- net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c index fd5799c..9c4c2eb 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c@@ -86,13 +86,13 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(designated_cost, S_IRUGO, show_designated_cost, NULL); static ssize_t show_port_id(struct net_bridge_port *p, char *buf) { - return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", p->port_id); + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", p->port_id); } static BRPORT_ATTR(port_id, S_IRUGO, show_port_id, NULL); static ssize_t show_port_no(struct net_bridge_port *p, char *buf) { - return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", p->port_no); + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", p->port_no); } static BRPORT_ATTR(port_no, S_IRUGO, show_port_no, NULL);No. This would be a visible change to applications. The bridge utilities should be fixed instead.Well, my reasoning was that if not the native tools got this right, what are the chances that other apps got it right? I don't know any other apps than brctl using this info, do you? We could check one or two apps to see what they do. JockeCurrent bridge-utils does not have the issue. It has been fixed for 5 years. The problem was fixed by: commit 0397c6aa48769505e6aa4481f0786c8f4eaaf890 Author: Jeremy Jackson [off-list ref] Date: Tue May 8 11:10:34 2007 -0700 I've noticed for a while that output is showing 0 for port_no and port_id It seems that somewhere in 2.6 sysfs land the following items got printed in hexadecimal, and brctl code was parsing for decimal only doug:/sys/class/net/eth0/brport# cat port_id 0x8001 doug:/sys/class/net/eth0/brport# cat port_no 0x1
Yeah, just noticed that too. On our embedded board we have the release just before that fix :( Jocke