Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Glauber Costa [off-list ref] wrote:

We need a broader audience for this, but if I understand the interface
right, those functions should not be called in fast paths at all (contrary
to the static_branch tests)

The static_branch tests can be called from irq context, so we can't just get
rid of the atomic op and use the mutex everywhere, we'd have
to live with both.

I will repost this series, with some more people in the CC list.

Great, thanks!

-- 
tejun