Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, 2012-05-08

Re: [PATCH 1/8] isdn/gigaset: ratelimit CAPI message dumps

From: Karsten Keil <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-28 09:33:29
Also in: lkml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 27.04.2012 12:29, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
Am 26.04.2012 08:39, schrieb Karsten Keil:
quoted
Am 26.04.2012 01:02, schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
quoted
Introduce a global ratelimit for CAPI message dumps to protect
 against possible log flood. Drop the ratelimit for ignored 
messages which is now covered by the global one.
Hmm, I think the only CAPI messages which would need a ratelimit 
are related to the DATA_B3 messages. If you need CAPI debug 
messages in most cases you do not need all of the DATA_B3, but 
you do not want to miss any other message related to the call 
control. With a general rate limit you do not have the control, 
which messages are logged and which are not.
The ratelimit introduced by this patch only applies to messages 
other than DATA_B3. Logging DATA_B3 messages is not done via 
dump_cmsg().
Thanks for the clarification, forget about my objection.
I ack this patch now.
I'd like to ratelimit specifically non-DATA_B3 messages because I 
saw a (possibly buggy) CAPI application flooding the log with 
FACILITY messages. Equally important, I'd like to make the 
ratelimit in do_nothing() / do_unsupported() bursty because I had
a case where I needed to see several ignored/unhandled CAPI
messages in quick succession. So this patch is killing two birds
with one stone for me.

The burst limit of 20 messages in 20 seconds is chosen to allow a 
complete call setup sequence to be logged, while limiting to one 
message per second in the long run.
quoted
And here maybe some cases, when even the DATA_B3 are important 
(e.g. searching bugs in flow control), so I would make it still 
conditional to allow to print all messages.
DATA_B3 dumps produce an enormous amount of log data and are 
therefore controlled separately by the DEBUG_MCMD flag. Someone
who enables that should know what she or he does. But if you need
them, you need them all. A ratelimit doesn't make sense there in
my experience.
quoted
And I'm not sure, if this is really something for stable.
It's pretty simple and localized, a net simplification, and only 
affects generation of debugging messages, so I think it's safe.
But if you see a problem there I can drop the "CC: stable" line.
I let the decision about it to you and the stable maintainers.

- -- 
Karsten Keil
Linux Kernel Development
Tel: +49 175 7249132
Mail: keil@b1-systems.de

B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+buHwACgkQo5VVC52CNcRoygCfWwPlWZ+A48OwEkr/MtK6PeNG
0UEAnipdxPSZDKa4s99LlGYwvggWIIAJ
=CLr6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help