Re: suspicious RCU usage warnings in 3.3.0
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-04-12 01:13:49
Also in:
lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-04-12 01:13:49
Also in:
lkml
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <redacted> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:45:07 -0700
If I am confused about the simple function call, and if control is really passing via an interrupt or exception, then rcu_irq_enter() should be called on entry to the interrupt or exception and rcu_irq_exit() should be called on exit.
Hmm, it seems the convention changed such that platforms aren't supposed to invoke do_softirq() from their trap return trap any more. It's handled completely by irq_exit(). When did that start happening? :-) Anyways I bet that's the problem, sparc64 invokes do_softirq() in it's trap return path if softirqs are pending, and that doesn't do any of the RCU frobbing you mention.