Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup: get rid of populate for memcg
From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-09 20:18:52
Also in:
cgroups
On 04/09/2012 03:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:51:10PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:quoted
On 04/09/2012 02:40 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:quoted
which BTW seems incorrect even on its own - unmounting and mounting again would probably make the same notifier registered multiple times corrupting notification chain, and ref inc on the parent.For the maintainers: Should I fix those in a new submission, or do you intend to do it yourselves? the refcnt dropping should probably be done in my patch, it is a new leak (sorry). The hotplug notifier, as tejun pointed, was already there. It seems simple enough to fix, so if you guys want, I can bundle it in a new submission.I think it would be best to create a separate patch which is routed through the usual memcg path (I suppose memcg patches go through -mm?). Thanks.
Tejun, After debugging this a bit, I found most of it not to be a problem. Unless I am *very* wrong (and I both read and tested stuff), mount operations do not recreate the root cgroup. So stuff like the hotcpu notifier, etc, won't be a problem. Now, you are definitely correct in pointing out that we start leaking stuff now - my bad. But I guess I can then bundle it in a new submission, after shuffling around stuff a bit. It is really not a bug now, so no reason to route it separately.