Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-04-09

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup: get rid of populate for memcg

From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-09 20:18:52
Also in: cgroups

On 04/09/2012 03:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:51:10PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
quoted
On 04/09/2012 02:40 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted
which BTW seems incorrect even on its
own - unmounting and mounting again would probably make the same
notifier registered multiple times corrupting notification chain, and
ref inc on the parent.

For the maintainers: Should I fix those in a new submission, or do
you intend to do it yourselves?

the refcnt dropping should probably be done in my patch, it is a new
leak (sorry). The hotplug notifier, as tejun pointed, was already
there.

It seems simple enough to fix, so if you guys want, I can bundle it in
a new submission.
I think it would be best to create a separate patch which is routed
through the usual memcg path (I suppose memcg patches go through
-mm?).

Thanks.
Tejun,

After debugging this a bit, I found most of it not to be a problem. 
Unless I am *very* wrong (and I both read and tested stuff), mount 
operations do not recreate the root cgroup. So stuff like the hotcpu 
notifier, etc, won't be a problem.

Now, you are definitely correct in pointing out that we start leaking 
stuff now - my bad.

But I guess I can then bundle it in a new submission, after shuffling 
around stuff a bit. It is really not a bug now, so no reason to route it 
separately.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help