[PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
[PATCH V3 4/6] net/mlx4_en: sk_prio <=> UP for untagged traffic · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
[PATCH V3 3/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
[PATCH V3 2/6] net/mlx4_core: set port QoS attributes · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
[PATCH V3 6/6] IB/rdma_cm: TOS <=> UP mapping for IBoE · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
[PATCH V3 1/6] net/mlx4_en: Force user priority by QP attribute · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
[PATCH V3 5/6] net/route: export symbol ip_tos2prio · Amir Vadai <hidden> · 2012-03-27
Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support · Or Gerlitz <hidden> · 2012-03-28
Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-03-28
Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-03-29
Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support · Or Gerlitz <hidden> · 2012-03-29

Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-29 03:14:12

Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 à 00:21 +0200, Or Gerlitz a écrit :

For the ratelimit Eric D. provided feedback and it was implemented
along his suggestion,


My suggestion was exactly the following :

/sys/class/net/eth2/qos/0/ratelimit
...
/sys/class/net/eth2/qos/7/ratelimit

and now John and Ben have other suggestions,

I dont think so.

Amir provided in V2 something that was not what I suggested.

/sys/class/net/eth2/ratelimit/tc0
...
/sys/class/net/eth2/ratelimit/tc7


And this is where John, Ben were complaining.

[ Obviously I totally agree with them ]

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help