[PATCH net-next 01/10] sfc: Fix calculation of vf_i in map_vi_index()
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-10 00:48:53
Subsystem:
networking drivers, sfc network driver, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Edward Cree, Linus Torvalds
From: Robert Stonehouse <redacted> This was broken during refactoring to use efx_vf_size(). [bwh: Keep using efx_vf_size()] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena_sriov.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena_sriov.c
index 80976e8..9cb3b84 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena_sriov.c@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static bool map_vi_index(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned abs_index, if (abs_index < EFX_VI_BASE) return true; - vf_i = (abs_index - EFX_VI_BASE) * efx_vf_size(efx); + vf_i = (abs_index - EFX_VI_BASE) / efx_vf_size(efx); if (vf_i >= efx->vf_init_count) return true;
--
1.7.7.6
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.