Thread (52 messages) 52 messages, 10 authors, 2012-03-13

Re: [RFC PATCH v0 1/2] net: bridge: propagate FDB table into hardware

From: John Fastabend <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-01 22:10:46
Also in: kvm

On 3/1/2012 6:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:25:56AM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
quoted
Agreed. I think adding some ndo_ops for bridging offloads here would
work. For example the DSA infrastructure and/or macvlan devices might
need this. Along the lines of extending this RFC,

[RFC] hardware bridging support for DSA switches
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/16578/


.John
One place where this might not work well would be
macvtap which is not a network device so it doesn't have
its own address, instead it inherits one from macvlan.
But is macvtap really doing any forwarding or implementing any
RX filters? Took a quick scan and it looks like the forwarding
logic is all in the macvlan code paths. In this case I suspect
if we enable macvlan then any device built on top of it would
work.

.John
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help