Re: [RFC PATCH v0 1/2] net: bridge: propagate FDB table into hardware
From: John Fastabend <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-01 22:10:46
Also in:
kvm
From: John Fastabend <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-01 22:10:46
Also in:
kvm
On 3/1/2012 6:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:25:56AM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:quoted
Agreed. I think adding some ndo_ops for bridging offloads here would work. For example the DSA infrastructure and/or macvlan devices might need this. Along the lines of extending this RFC, [RFC] hardware bridging support for DSA switches http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/16578/ .JohnOne place where this might not work well would be macvtap which is not a network device so it doesn't have its own address, instead it inherits one from macvlan.
But is macvtap really doing any forwarding or implementing any RX filters? Took a quick scan and it looks like the forwarding logic is all in the macvlan code paths. In this case I suspect if we enable macvlan then any device built on top of it would work. .John