From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:30:11 +1100

Hi,

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:24:10 +0200 "Yuval Mintz" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I don't fully understand your merge - it seems to create a mash between
the "bnx2x: fix bnx2x_storm_stats_update() on big endian" patch in net,
and the "bnx2x: consistent statistics after internal driver reload"
patch in net-next.

That is exactly what the merge conflict resolution did.  i.e. the patch
you supplied below is not needed in linux-next because that is
effectively what I did.  It is the same as Dave will do when he merges
the net tree into the net-next tree as well, I assume.

I've taken care of this.