Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 5 authors, 2012-02-15

Re: [patch net-next] cxgb3: update firmware version

From: Rick Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-14 20:02:32
Also in: lkml

On 02/14/2012 10:21 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:17:27AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
quoted
What does an end-user/customer see and do?  When they are told that
version the firmware, specified down to the fix level, fixes a
problem they are having, how will they know that firmware blob
filename drvfw-X.bin on a download/archive site has that fix?
[...]

Customers currently can't get bug fixes by updating the firmware.
Think about it.
Because in this case at least the driver is requesting a specific 
filename down to the minor and micro level and a change in the filename 
requires a change in the driver?

#define FW_VERSION __stringify(FW_VERSION_MAJOR) "."                    \
         __stringify(FW_VERSION_MINOR) "." __stringify(FW_VERSION_MICRO)
#define FW_FNAME "cxgb3/t3fw-" FW_VERSION ".bin"

rather than the driver having logic to make it willing to accept later 
minor/micro changes by being more sophisticated in its specification of 
firmware file.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help