On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:13:13PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
quoted
+ struct rtattr *ext_req;
+ u32 *ext_req_data;
+ req = (struct rtnl_req_extended *)cb->nlh;
+ ext_req = (struct rtattr *)&req->ext;
+ if (ext_req->rta_type == IFLA_EXT_MASK) {
+ ext_req_data = RTA_DATA(ext_req);
+ ext_filter_mask = *ext_req_data;
+ }
+ }
We cannot trust a flag to tell us what the length of the message is. We
have to check the value of nlmsg_len (which netlink has already
validated as being within the skb length and >= our declared request
header length). I think that makes the flag redundant.
In fact, I think we should really use nlmsg_parse() here. That might be
overkill when there's only a single valid attribute; I don't know.
I think it's worth the effort. You get all the validation for free. And
please use the netlink interface in <net/netlink.h>, the rtattr based
interface has been deprecated a while ago.