From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2012-02-14 11:10:25
commit 5a698af53f (bond: service netpoll arp queue on master device)
use a dubious test : if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE)
It seems to me IFF_SLAVE is present on dev->flags only ?
What am I missing ?
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Date: 2012-02-14 13:28:14
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:10:21PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
commit 5a698af53f (bond: service netpoll arp queue on master device)
use a dubious test : if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE)
It seems to me IFF_SLAVE is present on dev->flags only ?
What am I missing ?
I want to say there was a reason for checking priv_flags, but if there was, it
escapes me now. Either way, ->flags is definately what we want now.
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2012-02-14 19:44:12
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:10:21 +0100
commit 5a698af53f (bond: service netpoll arp queue on master device)
use a dubious test : if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE)
It seems to me IFF_SLAVE is present on dev->flags only ?
What am I missing ?
Like Neil, this looks correct to me, please submit this formally.
Thanks.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2012-02-14 20:26:12
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:11:59 +0100
commit 5a698af53f (bond: service netpoll arp queue on master device)
tested IFF_SLAVE flag against dev->priv_flags instead of dev->flags
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Cc: WANG Cong <redacted>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>