[PATCH v3 0/6] skb paged fragment destructors · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25
[PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-31
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-01-31
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-02-01
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> · 2012-01-31
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-02-01
[PATCH v3 2/6] net: move destructor_arg to the front of sk_buff. · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25
[PATCH v3 3/6] net: add support for per-paged-fragment destructors · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25
[PATCH v3 4/6] net: only allow paged fragments with the same destructor to be coalesced. · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25
[PATCH v3 6/6] sunrpc: use SKB fragment destructors to delay completion until page is released by network stack. · Ian Campbell <hidden> · 2012-01-25

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than individually

From: Ian Campbell <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-01 10:09:51

On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:02 +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:

Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 09:39 +0000, Ian Campbell a écrit :

quoted

I'll investigate the sending side. The sender is running a 2.6.32 distro
kernel. Maybe I need to tweak it somewhat.

Thats strange, even a very old kernel is able to sustain Gigabit line
rate with pktgen. Maybe a problem with a switch and ethernet pauses ?

Tanks, that was something I was going to investigate. These machines are
in our lab so I need to figure out if they are even directly attached to
the same switch etc.

Ian.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help