Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 8 authors, 2012-01-24

Re: [PATCH] r8169: Randomise invalid MAC addresses

From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-24 18:47:44
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 19:28 +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
Pavel Machek [off-list ref] :
[...]
quoted
Kernel should provide hw abstraction, and that should mean doing
something about commonly-bad ethernet cards.
Ask for a refund ?
[...]

This is mostly being done in embedded systems where the system
developers control both the kernel and all of userspace and can easily
bodge things in the userland init process.

Then some adventurous users want to run custom kernels on those systems
and have a reasonable way to deal with that.  The original system worked
and they cannot replace just the network interface, so it is no good
asking for a refund.

None of the push-back from netdev is going to have any effect on the
embedded system developers who are failing to program MAC addresses
properly; it's only going to hurt those adventurous users.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help