Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 3 authors, 2012-01-23

Re: [PATCH] netdev/ethernet: dev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb

From: Pradeep A. Dalvi <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-23 10:37:39
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
Le dimanche 22 janvier 2012 à 02:27 +0530, Pradeep A. Dalvi a écrit :
quoted
Replaced deprecating dev_alloc_skb with netdev_alloc_skb in drivers/net/ethernet
...

quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c515.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c515.c
index f67a5d3..68fd765 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c515.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c515.c
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static int corkscrew_open(struct net_device *dev)
                              vp->rx_ring[i].next = 0;
                      vp->rx_ring[i].status = 0;      /* Clear complete bit. */
                      vp->rx_ring[i].length = PKT_BUF_SZ | 0x80000000;
-                     skb = dev_alloc_skb(PKT_BUF_SZ);
+                     skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, PKT_BUF_SZ);
                      vp->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
                      if (skb == NULL)
                              break;  /* Bad news!  */

One of the difference between netdev_alloc_skb() and dev_alloc_skb() is
the former initializes skb->dev.

So you should remove the extra "skb->dev = dev;" lines that sometimes
are after the dev_alloc_skb() calls.

[ They were redundant anyway because eth_type_trans() also sets skb->dev
]
Thanks! Shall take extra skb->dev = dev into consideration.

Eric, is this ok to assume that the memory address given to
dma_map_single & received from dma_unmap_single would remain same
across all platforms? Thanks in advance!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help