Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:36:59AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

W dniu 16 grudnia 2011 07:40 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki
[off-list ref] napisał:

quoted

W dniu 15 grudnia 2011 22:38 użytkownik John W. Linville
[off-list ref] napisał:

quoted

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

quoted

2011/12/15 John W. Linville [off-list ref]:

quoted

commit 42a3b63bb2ca4996a3d1210a004eae2333f1119e

Dave,

Here are a few more fixes intended for the 3.2 release.  They are
all small and narrowly focused.

John, I've made a mistake and didn't use [PATCH 3.2] header to make it
clean my patch is fix. Could you take a look at
[PATCH] bcma: support for suspend and resume
please?

It's not one-liner, but fixes lock ups, which I believe - we really
want to avoid.

It's late in the release cycle, and Dave specifically asked me to slow down.

Are these suspend/resume lockups a regression?  Or have they always
been there?  Do they happen to everyone?

The bug is present since first days of bcma. That's why I even decided
to add stable to CC.

Personally I've tested that only on 1 machine (I don't have more
suspendable machines with mini PCIe slot). However all Macbook 8.1/8.2
users have to remove b43 & bcma before suspending [0], they complain
about that since ever.

Arend: I know you're also complaining for suspend in bcma. Can you
comment on this?

[0] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1695746

User nephyrin on #bcm-users has confirmed this patch fixes
suspend&resume for him. Without this patch he got deadlock without
seeing any kernel panic logs - quite an ugly case.

I still think this patch may be worth taking as fix and backporting too.

What patch specifically?  What is the git commit id of it in Linus's
tree?  Without that information, telling stable@ about it is
pointless...

greg k-h