Re: NAT question
From: Stephen Clark <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 17:28:40
On 01/25/2012 11:52 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mercredi 25 janvier 2012 à 10:54 -0500, Stephen Clark a écrit :quoted
Can iptables do a network to network nat without having to write out a bunch of nat rules. In other words translate 192.168.198.0/24 to 172.16.10.0/24 without having to write out 256 rules. Also can iptables handle 1000 nat rules like above if they have to be written out on a 1.66ghz intel dual core atom with 1gb of mem. I know this isn't appropriate question for devel list but I didn't find anything googling. Thanks,If you are forced to use 256 rules, you could split them into 16 tables of 16 rules and do a hash split. Since these rules are run only for new connections, it might be OK performance wise, depending on rate of connection establishment. If not, you can try NETMAP :) # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.198.0/24 -j NETMAP --to 172.16.10.0/24 # iptables -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 NETMAP all -- * * 192.168.198.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 172.16.10.0/24
Thanks Eric,
I assume I need an additional rule like this to translate in the other
direction?
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.10.0/24 -j NETMAP --to
198.168.198.0/24
iptables -t nat -nvL POSTROUTING
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
15 2535 NETMAP all -- * * 192.168.198.0/24
0.0.0.0/0 172.16.10.0/24
0 0 NETMAP all -- * * 172.16.10.0/24
0.0.0.0/0 198.168.198.0/24
Also now that I am clued to NETMAP I found this example:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j NETMAP --to
10.5.6.0/24
using mangle and PREROUTING - does it matter?
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)
"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)