Re: iproute2: proper detection of libxtables position and flags

iproute2: proper detection of libxtables position and flags · Jan Engelhardt <hidden> · 2011-12-31
iproute2: fix calling up the xt action · Jan Engelhardt <hidden> · 2011-12-31
iproute2: avoid use of implicit declarations · Jan Engelhardt <hidden> · 2011-12-31
Re: iproute2: avoid use of implicit declarations · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2012-01-03
Re: iproute2: proper detection of libxtables position and flags · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2012-01-03
Re: iproute2: proper detection of libxtables position and flags · Jan Engelhardt <hidden> · 2012-01-03

From: Jan Engelhardt <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-03 22:18:09

On Tuesday 2012-01-03 22:47, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:17:56 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Jan Engelhardt <redacted>
Date: 2011-09-24 23:37:34.405739159 +0200
Upstream: not sent yet

Any tests involving iptables _MUST_ utilize pkg-config to find the
proper locations of the installation.

Will this work for all distros? Is this backwards compatiable?

The pkg-config file was shipped since the start, and it is the
one supported variant to find/link the lib.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help