Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c

[PATCH 0/2] Proposed fixes for tcp memory pressure · Glauber Costa <hidden> · 2011-12-15
[PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · Glauber Costa <hidden> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · Glauber Costa <hidden> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · Glauber Costa <hidden> · 2011-12-16
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · Glauber Costa <hidden> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Explicitly call tcp creation and init from memcontrol.c · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-12-15
[PATCH 1/2] Move limit definitions outside CONFIG_INET · Glauber Costa <hidden> · 2011-12-15
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move limit definitions outside CONFIG_INET · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-12-15

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-12-15 16:59:28
Also in: cgroups, lkml

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:13:16 +0900

Could you remake the patch onto the 'latest' linux-next ?
As Dave mentioned, some bandaids are already applied and this patch hunks.

He was correct to submit this against net-next.

The bandaid in linux-next is temporary and Stephen will remove it
once we fix things properly in net-next.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help