Re: NFS TCP race condition with SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE
From: Trond Myklebust <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-22 12:10:40
Also in:
linux-nfs
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 12:02 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 22/11/11 11:38, Trond Myklebust wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 18:14 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:quoted
Following some debugging, I believe that the attached patch fixes the problem. Simply returning EAGAIN is not sufficient, as the task does not get requeued, and times out 13 seconds later (as per our mount options). Setting the SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE bit causes the requeue to happen. I realize that this is a gross hack and I should probably not be using SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE in that way. Is there a better way to achieve the same solution?What you are doing will cause the request to be put to sleep with no guarantee that it will ever be woken up. Why would we want to do that if there is no report of a tcp window/buffer space congestion?But the reason we get to this code is because there was a report of space collision. What would you suggest instead? Changing xs_{tcp,udp}_send_request() to retry in this case would defeat the point of having xs_nospace().
I suggest doing absolutely nothing: do what you originally proposed, which is to report the EAGAIN so that the client state machine retries the socket write. My point is that this is a context which is _not_ atomic with the original report of tcp window/buffer space congestion. There are no locks or anything else that will guarantee that the congestion still exists, and the fact that the SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE flag is now clear indicates that this is the case. The whole purpose of xs_nospace() is to wait until a congestion condition clears. If the congestion clears before we get here, then we have no reason to do anything special other than retry. Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com