Re: [RFC] [ver3 PATCH 3/6] virtio_net: virtio_net driver changes
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-18 06:24:41
Also in:
kvm
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 01:08 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:34 +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:quoted
Changes for multiqueue virtio_net driver.[...]quoted
@@ -677,25 +730,35 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet { struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); int cpu; - unsigned int start; for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { - struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats - = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu); - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes; - - do { - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp); - tpackets = stats->tx_packets; - tbytes = stats->tx_bytes; - rpackets = stats->rx_packets; - rbytes = stats->rx_bytes; - } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start)); - - tot->rx_packets += rpackets; - tot->tx_packets += tpackets; - tot->rx_bytes += rbytes; - tot->tx_bytes += tbytes; + int qpair; + + for (qpair = 0; qpair < vi->num_queue_pairs; qpair++) { + struct virtnet_send_stats __percpu *tx_stat; + struct virtnet_recv_stats __percpu *rx_stat;While you're at it, you can drop the per-CPU stats and make them only per-queue. There is unlikely to be any benefit in maintaining them per-CPU while receive and transmit processing is serialised per-queue.
It allows you to update stats without a lock. Whats the benefit of having them per queue? -- Sasha.