Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 8 authors, 2011-11-22

Re: [RFC] kvm tools: Implement multiple VQ for virtio-net

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2011-11-16 07:23:17
Also in: kvm, virtualization

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:34:42AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:05:07 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:25:17PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Asias He [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Why both the bandwidth and latency performance are dropping so dramatically
with multiple VQ?
What's the expected benefit from multiple VQs
Heh, the original patchset didn't mention this :) It really should.
They are supposed to speed up networking for high smp guests.
If we have one queue per guest CPU, does this allow us to run lockless?

Thanks,
Rusty.
LLTX? It's supposed to be deprecated, isn't it?

-- 
MST
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help