Re: [PATCH/RFC 00/11] HFSC patches
flat view
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-05 03:56:08
On 05.11.2011 03:32, Michal Soltys wrote:
Those are most of the patches I've been sitting on for a while. For the most part they are either small corrections or simplifications (marked with s) - but there are also some new things (marked with !), the most interesting being #8 probably. All changes are richly commented in respective commit messages. I've been using them for a while - so unless I missed some subtlety, all should be fine.
Thanks Michal. It has been quite a while since I've last looked at this and this is complicated stuff, please give me a few days to review your patches.
Apart from these, there's still one subtle thing to do w.r.t. cl_cvtmin (during init_vf(), as this value is lagged relatively to the situation at the time of enqueue). On a side note, I was thinking about something like hfsc-strict or so - where [uplink] interface could be upperlimited on hfsc qdisc level, but all the class upperlimit would be otherwise gone. Not sure if anyone would be even interested in something like that at all.
So classes would just use link-sharing curves? That's already possible, so I probably don't get your idea.