Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 4 authors, 2011-10-06

Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-04 05:44:36
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On 10/04/2011 05:16 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
It seems memcg->tcp.tcp_memory_pressure has no locks and not atomic.

no problematic race ?

Thanks,
-Kame
Well,

prior to this patch, it was a global variable. And nobody complained so 
far...

My impression is that the only thing that really needs to be atomic is
the memory accounting, which is already. If we miss a memory pressure 
condition entry, we'll get to it next time.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help