Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2011-10-21

Re: [PATCH] net: ipv6: Allow netlink to set IPv6 address scope

From: Brian Haley <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-17 21:32:09

On 10/16/2011 10:26 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
RFC 3879 deprecated site-local addresses because the were non-unique and thus
ambiguous, and if they leak, they cause problems. This is not an issue
in the use
case I presented, because the addresses are syntactically global
addresses - they
just don't have global reachability.
Not very global then :(
quoted
The MIF problem statement (in the RFC editor's queue) talks about this problem,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-15 - perhaps it's
better to work there to develop a more generic solution (using DHCPv6, RA
options, etc) before making this change?
I don't think it's a good idea. Waiting for an IETF working group to
produce a standard
when it doesn't even have a problem statement finalized could take years.
It would be useful to give some input there, even if the Linux-specific
implementation of any standard plays with bits in the ifaddr.
Is there another reason why we shouldn't enable userspace to do what it wants?
In my opinion it just feels like a hack, because things won't work when your
wifi attaches to a walled garden, or there's a third interface - who wins the
tiebreaker?

I do see your point that it will help with the problem you're trying to solve,
hopefully someone else will offer their opinion.

-Brian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help