Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 3 authors, 2011-10-12

RE: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into separate function.

From: Wyborny, Carolyn <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-12 22:21:35

-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:49 PM
To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
Cc: Sowles, Jacob R; netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com;
sassmann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into
separate function.

From: Jeff Kirsher <redacted>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:38:26 -0700
quoted
From: Jacob Sowles <redacted>

DMA Coalescing code needs to be executed during reset, if enabled.
Moved
quoted
code to separate function and added a call to it in igb_reset.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Sowles <redacted>
Tested-by:  Aaron Brown <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <redacted>
Something is wrong here, this patch just adds the new function but no
actual callers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yes, you are correct.  We had a problem in our process and this patch got inadvertently changed during it, removing a substantial part of it, including the call to the new function.  I'm on it and will be submitting a replacement as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Carolyn Wyborny
Linux Development
LAN Access Division
Intel Corporation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help