RE: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into separate function.
From: Wyborny, Carolyn <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-12 22:21:35
-----Original Message----- From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of David Miller Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:49 PM To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Cc: Sowles, Jacob R; netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com Subject: Re: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into separate function. From: Jeff Kirsher <redacted> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:38:26 -0700quoted
From: Jacob Sowles <redacted> DMA Coalescing code needs to be executed during reset, if enabled.Movedquoted
code to separate function and added a call to it in igb_reset. Signed-off-by: Jacob Sowles <redacted> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <redacted>Something is wrong here, this patch just adds the new function but no actual callers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yes, you are correct. We had a problem in our process and this patch got inadvertently changed during it, removing a substantial part of it, including the call to the new function. I'm on it and will be submitting a replacement as soon as possible. Thanks, Carolyn Wyborny Linux Development LAN Access Division Intel Corporation