On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 02:32:03 PM David Howells wrote:
Paul Moore [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
We should probably do the same for the security/selinux/netif.c as it
uses the same logic; David is this something you want to tackle?
netif.c doesn't use any rcu_dereference*() function directly, though it does
use list_for_each_entry_rcu(). However, I'm not sure that's a problem.
What is it you're referring to?
My apologies, the netport.c and netif.c code is very, very similar and
whenever I see a patch just for one of the two it causes a reaction that you
saw above. While netif.c has a similar function, sel_netif_insert(), it is
slightly different and doesn't need a rcu_dereference() ad the netport.c code
does.
Sorry for the confusion.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com