Re: Question about memory leak detector giving false positive report for net/core/flow.c
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2011-09-29 14:22:14
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2011-09-29 14:22:14
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:08:47PM +0100, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
I tried this but it's tricky. The problem is that the percpu pointer returned by alloc_percpu() does not directly point to the per-cpu chunks and kmemleak would report most percpu allocations as leaks. So far the workaround is to simply mark the alloc_percpu() objects as never leaking and at least we avoid false positives in other areas. See the patch below (note that you have to increase the CONFIG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE as there are many alloc_percpu() calls before kmemleak is fully initialised):Seems that kernel.org is out and so tejon wont be seeing these.
That's ok, I don't aim this at the upcoming merging window. I don't have an alternative email address for him. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>