Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2011-09-28

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller

From: Kirill A. Shutemov <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-18 20:39:34
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 04:11:21PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 09/18/2011 04:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39:12AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
quoted
quoted
Always zero in root cgroup?
Yes, if we're not accounting, it should be zero. WARN_ON, maybe?
-ENOSYS?
I'd personally prefer WARN_ON. It is good symmetry from userspace PoV to 
always be able to get a value out of it. Also, it something goes wrong 
and it is not zero for some reason, this will help us find it.
What's the point to get non-relevant value?
What about -ENOSYS + WARN_ON?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help