Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 2011-09-12

Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: Add support for a filesystem to control swap files

From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-12 09:34:39
Also in: linux-mm, linux-nfs, lkml

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:04:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:36 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
The equivalent of ->direct_IO should be used for both reads and writes.
So the difference between DIO and swapIO is that swapIO needs the block
map pinned in memory.. So at the very least you'll need those
swap_{activate,deactivate} aops. The read/write-page thingies could
indeed be shared with DIO.
I'm travelling at the moment so it'll be later in the week when I investigate
properly but I agree swap_[de|a]ctivate are still necessary. NFS does not
need to pin a block map but it's still necessary for calling xs_set_memalloc.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help