Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 à 15:46 +0800, rongqing.li@windriver.com a
écrit :
From: Roy.Li <redacted>
Delete rcu_read_lock, it is redundant.
A good changelog and patch title are required.
Something like :
[PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove a rcu_read_lock in ndisc_constructor
in6_dev_get(dev) takes a reference on struct inet6_dev, we dont need rcu
locking in ndisc_constructor()
-----
Or, you could try to really use RCU and not take a reference (ie, use
__in6_dev_get() instead of in6_dev_get(dev).
Untested patch :
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
index 9da6e02..a4f4472 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static int ndisc_constructor(struct neighbour *neigh)
int is_multicast = ipv6_addr_is_multicast(addr);
rcu_read_lock();
- in6_dev = in6_dev_get(dev);
+ in6_dev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
if (in6_dev == NULL) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return -EINVAL;@@ -380,7 +380,6 @@ static int ndisc_constructor(struct neighbour *neigh)
parms = in6_dev->nd_parms;
__neigh_parms_put(neigh->parms);
neigh->parms = neigh_parms_clone(parms);
- rcu_read_unlock();
neigh->type = is_multicast ? RTN_MULTICAST : RTN_UNICAST;
if (!dev->header_ops) {@@ -409,7 +408,7 @@ static int ndisc_constructor(struct neighbour *neigh)
else
neigh->output = neigh->ops->output;
}
- in6_dev_put(in6_dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}