Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

On 09/19/2011 04:37 AM, David Miller wrote:

quoted

D-SACK is allowed to reside below snd_una. But the corresponding check
in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() is the exact opposite. It looks like a typo.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan<redacted>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet<redacted>

Applied, thanks.

Dave,

Have you also queued it up for stable as per Eric's remark that this was introduced in 2.6.24?

Sorry if this is implied in your workflow.

Thanks, Jan