Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/3 RFC] macvlan: MAC Address filtering support for passthru mode
flat view
From: Roopa Prabhu <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-11 13:18:02
Also in:
kvm
On 9/11/11 2:38 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:33:33AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:quoted
On 9/8/11 10:55 PM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:53:11PM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
Phase 1: Goal: Enable hardware filtering for all macvlan modes - In macvlan passthru mode the single guest virtio-nic connected will receive traffic that he requested for - In macvlan non-passthru mode all guest virtio-nics sharing the physical nic will see all other guest traffic but the filtering at guest virtio-nicI don't think guests currently filter anything.I was referring to Qemu-kvm virtio-net in virtion_net_receive->receive_filter. I think It only passes pkts that the guest OS is interested. It uses the filter table that I am passing to macvtap in this patch.This happens after userspace thread gets woken up and data is copied there. So relying on filtering at that level is going to be very inefficient on a system with multiple active guests. Further, and for that reason, vhost-net doesn't do filtering at all, relying on the backends to pass it correct packets.Ok thanks for the info. So in which case, phase 1 is best for PASSTHRU mode and for non-PASSTHRU when there is a single guest connected to a VF. For non-PASSTHRU multi guest sharing the same VF, Phase 1 is definitely better than putting the VF in promiscuous mode. But to address the concern you mention above, in phase 2 when we have more than one guest sharing the VF,It's probably more interesting for a card without SRIOV support.
If its an SRIOV card I am assuming people likely using PASSTHRU mode. Non-SRIOV cards will use any of the non-PASSTHRU mode.
quoted
we will have to add filter lookup in macvlan to filter pkts for each guest.Any chance to enable hardware filters for that?
NAFAIK. Am not sure how you would do it too. Its still a single device from where the host receives traffic from. Thanks, Roopa