Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] r8169: support new chips of RTL8111F
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Date: 2011-08-31 20:17:05
Also in:
lkml
Hayes Wang [off-list ref] : [...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c index 68f1e2f..c04fbc0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -4476,6 +4602,49 @@ static void rtl_hw_start_8168e_2(void __iomem *ioaddr, struct pci_dev *pdev) RTL_W8(Config5, RTL_R8(Config5) & ~Spi_en); } +static void rtl_hw_start_8168f_1(void __iomem *ioaddr, struct pci_dev *pdev)
[...]
+ RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, 0x27);
Hmmm... $ grep MaxTxPacketSize drivers/net/r8169.c MaxTxPacketSize = 0xec, /* 8101/8168. Unit of 128 bytes. */ RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, 0x27); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); RTL_W8(MaxTxPacketSize, TxPacketMax); Is the 0x27 value still in units of 128 bytes ? Could it be TxPacketMax as everywhere else in the driver instead of 0x27 ? -- Ueimor