Re: [RFC 5/5] [powerpc] Implement a p1010rdb clock source.
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-08 15:23:18
On 08/08/2011 05:18 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Our contact with Freescale would prefer that I not post that patch until we get the OK from freescale to do so since we received it under NDA.I don't think we currently need it. I prefer dropping and cleaning up the device tree stuff as it is not needed for the P1010 anyway. If a new processor shows up with enhanced capabilities requiring configuration via device tree, we or somebody else can provide a patch. Marc, what do you think?I will rebase shortly and provide a newer set of patches. I do think powerpc does need the device tree support. That is how the flexcan_probe is getting called. How would you suggest I do it otherwise?
I think Wolfgang was talking about removing the clock* attributes from the device tree, not the device tree bindings at all. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |