Re: [PATCH] net/smsc911x: add device tree probe support
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-31 00:42:43
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-07-26 · Re: [PATCH] net/smsc911x: add device tree probe support · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
- 2011-07-26 · Re: [PATCH] net/smsc911x: add device tree probe support · Shawn Guo <hidden>
- 2011-07-25 · Re: [PATCH] net/smsc911x: add device tree probe support · Grant Likely <hidden>
- 2011-07-25 · [PATCH] net/smsc911x: add device tree probe support · Shawn Guo <hidden>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:13:15AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:26:29AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:03:44AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:47:23AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:36:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
Since I do not get any suggestion here, I'm going to follow the driver name to use '911' as the model number. Please tell me if there is any better one.What is the manufacturer part name? lan9111 or lan91c11? The manufacturer's documented part number is almost always preferred.I just posted the v2 of the patch, and chose to use 'smsc,lan9115' which is the first model supported in the driver. This is the same approach I used with i.mx device bindings.You haven't answered the question.For 9115 example, the part number in data sheet is "LAN9115".
Okay, good. Thanks. g.