RE: [RFC] non-preemptible kernel socket for RAMster
From: Loke, Chetan <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-05 17:52:29
Also in:
linux-mm
-----Original Message----- From: Dan Magenheimer [mailto:dan.magenheimer@oracle.com] Sent: July 05, 2011 1:25 PM To: Loke, Chetan; netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Konrad Wilk; linux-mm Subject: RE: [RFC] non-preemptible kernel socket for RAMsterquoted
From: Loke, Chetan [mailto:Chetan.Loke@netscout.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:37 AM To: Dan Magenheimer; netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Konrad Wilk; linux-mm Subject: RE: [RFC] non-preemptible kernel socket for RAMsterquoted
In working on a kernel project called RAMster* (where RAM on a remote system may be used for clean page cache pages and for swap pages), I found I have need for a kernel socket to be used whenHow is RAMster+swap different than NBD's (pending etc?)support forSWAPquoted
over NBD?Hi Chetan -- Thanks for your question. I may be ignorant of details about NBD, but did some quick research using google. If I understand correctly, swap over NBD is still writing to a configured swap disk on the remote
Hi - I thought NBD-server needs a backing store(a file). Now the file itself could reside on a RAM-drive or disk-drive etc. And so a remote NBD(disk or RAM) can be mounted locally as a swap device. The local client should still see it as a block device. I haven't used the RAM-drive feature myself but you may want to check if it works or even borrow that logic in your code.
machine. RAMster is swapping to *RAM* on the remote machine. The idea is that most machines are very overprovisioned in RAM, and are rarely using all of their RAM, especially when a machine is (mostly) idle. In other words, the "max of the sums" of RAM usage on a group of machines is much lower than the "sum of the max" of RAM usage. So if the network is sufficiently faster than disk for moving a page of data, RAMster provides a significant performance improvement. OR RAMster may allow a significant reduction in the total amount of RAM across a data center. The version of RAMster I am working on now is really a proof-of-concept that works over sockets, using the ocfs2 cluster layer. One can easily envision a future "exo-fabric" which allows one machine to write to the RAM of another machine... for this future hardware, RAMster becomes much more interesting.
Or you can also try scst-in-RAM mode(if you want to experiment with different fabrics).
Thanks, Dan
Thanks Chetan Loke