(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-26
Re: [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-26
Re: [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-26
Re: [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-26
Re: [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-26
Re: [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-26
[PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-27
Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists · Andi Kleen <hidden> · 2011-07-27
Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-27
Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists · Andi Kleen <hidden> · 2011-07-27
Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2011-07-27
[PATCH] vfs: conditionally call inode_wb_list_del() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-28
Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-28
[PATCH] vfs: avoid call to inode_lru_list_del() if possible · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-07-28

Re: [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-07-26 09:42:10
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

[PATCH v2] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list

Workloads using pipes and sockets hit inode_sb_list_lock contention.

superblock s_inodes list is needed for quota, dirty, pagecache and
fsnotify management. pipe/anon/socket fs are clearly not candidates for
these.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help