Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 8 authors, 2011-08-04

Re: [PATCH] net: Fix security_socket_sendmsg() bypass problem.

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: 2011-07-26 11:21:23

Anton Blanchard wrote:
Not sure what happened to your email but the gains are evident at
just 2 packets.
I know your benchmark result, but that result is based on calling
security_socket_sendmsg() only once.

What we worry is that overhead by security_socket_sendmsg() kills the
performance gain for batched case.
I can help with testing - the commit included a microbenchmark for
the purposes of analysing its performance.
Yes please. The patch in msg11510.html would want some more discussion, but
the patch in msg11504.html is ready to benchmark on your environment.

Does SELinux want to receive nosec flag at selinux_socket_sendmsg() because
calling security_socket_sendmsg() more than once is meaningless for SELinux?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help