On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 15:12 +0100, David Miller wrote:
From: Ian Campbell <redacted>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:17:28 +0100
quoted
- put_dma(tx->index,eni_dev->dma,&j,(unsigned long)
- skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page + skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page_offset,
+ put_dma(tx->index,eni_dev->dma,&j,
+ (unsigned long)skb_frag_address(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i]),
This is not an equivalent transformation.
skb_frag_address() does a page_address() on the frag page, but that is
not what the code was doing here previously.
It's possible the code was buggy, but you can't do a fix like that
amidst what is supposed to be a semantically NOP transformation.
Ouch, you are absolutely right, I didn't spot that, sorry.
The original code does look pretty bogus though, indexing off a struct
page * like that -- CC'ing the ATM maintainer + list.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html