Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-07-06

Re: instant oops with AF_ROSE

From: Chuck Hast <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-06 11:42:32
Also in: linux-hams

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 06:57, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
The support for ipv4 over rose devices has been broken for as long as
the code has existed (I went back to 2.0.x just to make sure).  Try
this:

modprobe rose
ip link set rose0 up
ip addr add 11.0.0.3/8 dev rose0
ping -b 11.255.255.255

That should crash your box pretty well.
----- Text cut for bandwidth reduction-----------

It has been a while, and we were (still are I just am not active)  using FPAC
we have run a lot of IP through it, and never seemed to have a issue, but
perhaps this is not quite in that area.

I  am sure Bernard will see this and pitch in with more info. I am
just trying to
figure out if we are taking two different pieces here.

Here in FL I have ran both NetRom and IP over ROSE through FPAC boxes
with no issues that I can remember. FPAC is a wrapper around the rose piece.
We probably have people still doing IP inside ROSE through FPAC boxes around
the state, not sure who or where, but it would not be a surprise to me because
some use SMTP between their BBS devices.


Bernard, any comments?
-- 

Chuck Hast  -- KP4DJT --
To paraphrase my flight instructor;
"the only dumb question is the one you DID NOT ask resulting in my going
out and having to identify your bits and pieces in the midst of torn
and twisted metal."
---
Home web site:
www.wchast.com

ZoneMinder Demo and test site
www.wchast.com/zm
Login = guest
pwd   = guest
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help