On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:27:11PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:00 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
quoted
As the driver is now passing platform device to the DMA mapping functions,
we should give it valid DMA masks.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <redacted>
Acked-by: Russell King <redacted>
Since you made this patch the first in the series the commit message is not
quite right. Other than that:
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Ah, right. I forgot to change the commit message. How about following?
From: Mika Westerberg <redacted>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ep93xx: set DMA masks for the ep93xx_eth
Since the driver uses the DMA API, we should pass it valid DMA masks.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <redacted>
Acked-by: Russell King <redacted>
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
index 8207954..1d4b65f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
@@ -402,11 +402,15 @@ static struct resource ep93xx_eth_resource[] = {
}
};
+static u64 ep93xx_eth_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+
static struct platform_device ep93xx_eth_device = {
.name = "ep93xx-eth",
.id = -1,
.dev = {
- .platform_data = &ep93xx_eth_data,
+ .platform_data = &ep93xx_eth_data,
+ .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
+ .dma_mask = &ep93xx_eth_dma_mask,
},
.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(ep93xx_eth_resource),
.resource = ep93xx_eth_resource,--
1.7.4.4