On 6/9/2011 1:11 AM, David Miller wrote:
There is no reason to create a whole new socket address family, use
genetlink instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
The prospect of using NETLINK sockets was investigated and it seems to
be supporting the communication between user-space and kernel-space
processes.
One of the requirements/goals for this MSM_IPC Router is to enable the
communication between the processes running on different processors &
OSes, and the addressing mechanism of NETLINK sockets is insufficient to
address the processes running in different processors and OSes.
We also have the requirements of built-in name service, remote process's
status detection, location transparency etc. That is the reason for this
home-grown solution with a requirement for new socket address family.
Please let me know if you need any other information.
Thanks and Regards,
Karthik.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.