Thread (22 messages) flat view 22 messages, 5 authors, 2011-06-07

Re: bridge/netfilter: regression in 2.6.39.1

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-06 12:12:44
Also in: lkml

Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 13:48 +0200, Alexander Holler a écrit :
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Am 06.06.2011 13:15, schrieb Neil Horman:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:21:06PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
quoted
Hello,

I'm getting a oops in the bridge code in br_change_mtu() with
2.6.39.1. The patch below seems to fix that.

I'm not sure about the usage of dst_cow_metrics_generic() in
fake_dst_ops, but after having a quick look at it seems to be ok to
use that here.

Regards,

Alexander
How did the flags of the dst entry on which we're callnig dst_entry_write_ptr
wind up getting the  READ_ONLY flag set on it?  I don't see how we'er falling
into that clause in which we call cow_metrics when we call dst_metric_set.  It
seems like that flag is set erroneously.  perhaps we should just update
fake_rtable.dst to have the correct flags?
Neil
It is set by that change:

--------
@@ -124,7 +128,7 @@ void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net_bridge *br)
  	atomic_set(&rt->dst.__refcnt, 1);
  	rt->dst.dev = br->dev;
  	rt->dst.path = &rt->dst;
-	dst_metric_set(&rt->dst, RTAX_MTU, 1500);
+	dst_init_metrics(&rt->dst, br_dst_default_metrics, true);
  	rt->dst.flags	= DST_NOXFRM;
  	rt->dst.ops = &fake_dst_ops;
  }
--------
The true in dst_init_metrics() is responsible for that flag.
You are aware this change fixed an oops ?

read_only in this context means : In case this must be written, we make
a COW first
(allocate a piece of memory, copy the source in it before applying any
change)

It would be nice you send us the stack trace, so that we can have a clue
of whats going on.

Thanks
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help