Re: bridge/netfilter: regression in 2.6.39.1
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-06 12:12:44
Also in:
lkml
Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 13:48 +0200, Alexander Holler a écrit :
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Am 06.06.2011 13:15, schrieb Neil Horman:quoted
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:21:06PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:quoted
Hello, I'm getting a oops in the bridge code in br_change_mtu() with 2.6.39.1. The patch below seems to fix that. I'm not sure about the usage of dst_cow_metrics_generic() in fake_dst_ops, but after having a quick look at it seems to be ok to use that here. Regards, AlexanderHow did the flags of the dst entry on which we're callnig dst_entry_write_ptr wind up getting the READ_ONLY flag set on it? I don't see how we'er falling into that clause in which we call cow_metrics when we call dst_metric_set. It seems like that flag is set erroneously. perhaps we should just update fake_rtable.dst to have the correct flags? NeilIt is set by that change: --------@@ -124,7 +128,7 @@ void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net_bridge *br) atomic_set(&rt->dst.__refcnt, 1); rt->dst.dev = br->dev; rt->dst.path = &rt->dst; - dst_metric_set(&rt->dst, RTAX_MTU, 1500); + dst_init_metrics(&rt->dst, br_dst_default_metrics, true); rt->dst.flags = DST_NOXFRM; rt->dst.ops = &fake_dst_ops; } --------The true in dst_init_metrics() is responsible for that flag.
You are aware this change fixed an oops ? read_only in this context means : In case this must be written, we make a COW first (allocate a piece of memory, copy the source in it before applying any change) It would be nice you send us the stack trace, so that we can have a clue of whats going on. Thanks