Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2011-06-09

Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] inetpeer: remove unused list

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-09 03:47:38

Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 17:05 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:35:34 +0200
quoted
Andi Kleen and Tim Chen reported huge contention on inetpeer
unused_peers.lock, on memcached workload on a 40 core machine, with
disabled route cache.

It appears we constantly flip peers refcnt between 0 and 1 values, and
we must insert/remove peers from unused_peers.list, holding a contended
spinlock.

Remove this list completely and perform a garbage collection on-the-fly,
at lookup time, using the expired nodes we met during the tree
traversal.

This removes a lot of code, makes locking more standard, and obsoletes
two sysctls (inet_peer_gc_mintime and inet_peer_gc_maxtime). This also
removes two pointers in inet_peer structure.

There is still a false sharing effect because refcnt is in first cache
line of object [were the links and keys used by lookups are located], we
might move it at the end of inet_peer structure to let this first cache
line mostly read by cpus.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Didn't expect you to implement this so fast :-)

Applied, thanks!
Thanks David

I would be glad to hear about numbers from Andi and Tim, I am very
jealous of their 80 Threads machine ;)


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help