Re: [PATCH] Use unsigned variables for packet lengths in ip[6]_queue.
From: Dave Jones <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-02 19:25:00
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:36:51PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Not catastrophic, but ipqueue seems to be too trusting of what it gets > > > passed from userspace, and passes it on down to the page allocator, > > > where it will spew warnings if the page order is too high. > > > > > > __ipq_rcv_skb has several checks for lengths too small, but doesn't > > > seem to have any for oversized ones. I'm not sure what the maximum > > > we should check for is. I'll code up a diff if anyone has any ideas > > > on a sane maximum. > > > > Maybe the thing to do is to simply pass __GFP_NOWARN to nlmsg_new() > > in netlink_ack()? > > > > Anyone else have a better idea? > > So I went back to this today, and found something that doesn't look right. > After adding some instrumentation, and re-running my tests, I found that > the reason we were blowing up with enormous allocations was that we > were passing down a nlmsglen's like -1061109568 > > Is there any reason for that to be signed ? > The nlmsg_len entry of nlmsghdr is a u32, so I'm assuming this is a bug. > > With the patch below, I haven't been able to reproduce the problem, but > I don't know if I've inadvertantly broken some other behaviour somewhere > deeper in netlink where this is valid. any feedback on this ? am I barking up the wrong tree ? Dave