Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors
From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-09 20:54:37
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-05-22 · Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors · Renato Westphal <hidden>
- 2011-05-17 · Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors · David Lamparter <hidden>
- 2011-05-17 · Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2011-05-17 · Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors · David Lamparter <hidden>
- 2011-05-10 · Re: [PATCH 0/7] Network namespace manipulation with file descriptors · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
David Miller [off-list ref] writes:
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:59:55 -0700quoted
David Miller [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The networking bits look OK to me: Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>Are you merging sendmmsg through the netdev tree?Yes.quoted
The conflicts on syscall syscall numbers are an unfortunate pain.The way we've solved this before is the tree that cares pulls in the net-next-2.6 tree to resolve the conflict.
If that is the precedent that then that makes sense. You are good at not rewinding net-next so I don't expect there will be a problem there. Do you know if there are any plans to support sendmmsg on parisc for 2.6.40? That could get sticky as the parisc tree has a bunch of syscall catchup support they are doing now. Eric