Re: [PATCH 2/7] ns: Introduce the setns syscall
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-07 08:01:08
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-05-11 · Re: [PATCH 2/7] ns: Introduce the setns syscall · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2011-05-11 · Re: [PATCH 2/7] ns: Introduce the setns syscall · Nathan Lynch <hidden>
- 2011-05-08 · Re: [PATCH 2/7] ns: Introduce the setns syscall · Matt Helsley <hidden>
- 2011-05-07 · Re: [PATCH 2/7] ns: Introduce the setns syscall · Daniel Lezcano <hidden>
- 2011-05-07 · Re: [PATCH 2/7] ns: Introduce the setns syscall · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Le samedi 7 mai 2011 05:24:56 Eric W. Biederman, vous avez écrit :
Pieces of this puzzle can also be solved by instead of coming up with a general purpose system call coming up with targed system calls perhaps socketat that solve a subset of the larger problem. Overall that appears to be more work for less reward.
socketat() is still required for multithreaded namespace-aware userspace, I believe. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.info/ http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis