Re: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2011-05-24 23:33:52
Also in:
linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml
On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be appropriate to push this through your tree?
I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better. Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> -hpa