On 12/05/11 10:55, Michał Mirosław wrote:
2011/5/12 Franco Fichtner [off-list ref]:
quoted
I found this while skimming through recent net-next patches.
I'm not quite sure if the padding in this struct is correct now.
Nice catch. But please send the patch inline instead of as an attachment.
Thanks, but I have a short question. Are the empty strings in
this struct really needed?
/* NETIF_F_TSO6 */ "tx-tcp6-segmentation",
/* NETIF_F_FSO */ "tx-fcoe-segmentation",
"",
"",
/* NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC */ "tx-checksum-fcoe-crc",
They seem to have caused this mess in the first place and I would
think they could be removed entirely.
I will resend the patch later today as inline. Sorry about that.
Franco